Hello Dear Readers!
These are indeed
interesting times.
There are elections
in France, upcoming elections in the UK, the continuing tensions with
Russia, China and the US over Syria and all the while a seemingly
unstoppable lurch to the right in countries throughout the world.
And then there’s
the seemingly small matter of ‘Trumpcare’.
In At Number Ten
Now, as you may or
my not know, I’m not American. My main concern at the moment is the
increasingly likely spectre of the Conservative party getting four
more years to underfund and undermine The NHS, Social Care, and
pretty much any public service you can name, in favour of tax cuts to the most well
off. Yeah, you might just pick up that I’m not their greatest fan.
So why, you may ask,
have I chosen to focus this week on affairs across the pond?
Well since the rise
of President Trump and the Republicans (why does that sound so much like a pop group from the seventies?), I think it’s quite natural to direct one’s attention in
that direction. It seems like barely a day goes by without his name
cropping up in the news or social media in connection to some
unfortunate remark, some, um, misunderstanding, some epic tweetstorm, or some gap in the
knowledge you might expect from one of the most powerful individuals
in the world. It’s the kind of thing that makes one sit up and take
notice.
The Whole Tooth
So, when, earlier
this year, Mr Trump announced he would be repealing and replacing the
Affordable Care Act put into place by his predecessor Barak Obama it
was something I had a close look at. That look made me very glad
that, in the face of embarrassing defeat, the president and his team
decided to pull it. When it resurfaced this last week and actually managed to get through Congress, well that really got my attention.
The timing of the
announcement really couldn’t have come at a more apt time. My
wonderful wife, Tina, is having trouble once again with the left hip
that has caused her continuous pain and issues with her mobility since suffering a neurological stroke last year. This was alleviated around six months ago with the administration of
a steroid injection.
It really was a miraculous thing (in the strictly secular sense) and meant that a limb that had been dragging and twisting since her hospitalisation was, within 24 hours, capable of a few moments of can-can. Sadly this was without the frilly skirt, stockings or suspenders but then you can’t have everything. On top of this a wisdom tooth has decided that it wants out, and has unhelpfully decided to cause an abscess in doing so. Emergency dentist here we come!
It really was a miraculous thing (in the strictly secular sense) and meant that a limb that had been dragging and twisting since her hospitalisation was, within 24 hours, capable of a few moments of can-can. Sadly this was without the frilly skirt, stockings or suspenders but then you can’t have everything. On top of this a wisdom tooth has decided that it wants out, and has unhelpfully decided to cause an abscess in doing so. Emergency dentist here we come!
Over The Limit
Now here in the
Motherland the good news is that these two treatments are free at
the point of delivery, or, in the case of the emergency dentist,
available for only a small fee (Tina not being registered with a dentist.) This is due to the NHS, something
I’ve blogged about before (see here) and which is one (but only one)
of the main reasons I hope that the general election in early June will
see the end of May.
In the US it is of course a different story and the treatment would a matter for the insurance companies making healthcare a luxury that neither of us would be likely to be able to afford. You see both myself and my beloved have what I believe are called pre-existing conditions. I was born with Spina Bifida (see here) whilst Tina suffers from Hypothyroidism. Now, as far as I can glean from the minutiae of the new legislation this would mean that, although insurance companies would not be able to turn us away from their coverage they could (and most probably would) charge us exorbitant fees for being covered.
In the US it is of course a different story and the treatment would a matter for the insurance companies making healthcare a luxury that neither of us would be likely to be able to afford. You see both myself and my beloved have what I believe are called pre-existing conditions. I was born with Spina Bifida (see here) whilst Tina suffers from Hypothyroidism. Now, as far as I can glean from the minutiae of the new legislation this would mean that, although insurance companies would not be able to turn us away from their coverage they could (and most probably would) charge us exorbitant fees for being covered.
What this means, in
a nutshell, is that there may well be a growing number of American
citizens for whom health insurance is an unaffordable luxury, and
these are likely to be just the people who are more likely to need it. When
it’s a decision between food on the table and having the insurance
to take care of your chronic condition then the term ‘life limiting
illness’ suddenly takes on a whole new meaning.
One Billion Dollars!
Back when the bill
was first presented, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office
(CBO) estimated
that
if the ACA continues to be the law of the land, the number of
uninsured Americans – currently 28 million
would
rise steeply to a whopping 54 million. There has been a
little re jigging of the new legislation in order to get it through
congress and the addition of $88 billion worth of subsidies to those
with pre-existing conditions since then. It is notable though that it is unclear to
whom this would be payable. It’s also, when shared out between those affected, not as much as you might
think.
To put the cherry on
this rather horrific cake the term ‘pre-existing conditions’ has
in the past included rape, domestic abuse, post-partum depression,
caesarian sections and prior childbirth. Insurance companies have also been known to increase premiums for rape and domestic violence
victims. As the protection against this would be removed under the new
bill it seems that Trumpcare will be particularly tough on American
women.
I know I hail from
different shores. I know I lean to the left (politically, not just
because my right legs is three inches longer) but I can’t be alone
in recognising the horror implicit in this. It seems that, as a
consequence of chasing the ideological dream of rugged individuality,
of conjuring up images of apple pie and check shirt wearing cowboys, possibly sat in a fifties style diner whilst polishing a .45, America is being duped into putting the interests of big business
ahead of the well being; of those tired, poor, and huddled masses it
once asked to be given.
Until next time...
No comments:
Post a Comment